↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012578.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Malone, Susan Biggar, Sheila Javadpour, Zai Edworthy, Greg Sheaf, Imelda Coyne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Psychology 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Decision Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 26 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,154,711
of 14,263,181 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,674
of 10,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,427
of 259,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,263,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.