↓ Skip to main content

The polio epidemic in The Netherlands, 1992/1993.

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Reviews, January 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 286)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The polio epidemic in The Netherlands, 1992/1993.
Published in
Public Health Reviews, January 1993
Pubmed ID
Authors

J K van Wijngaarden, A M van Loon

Abstract

Starting September 1992, an outbreak of poliomyelitis occurred in the Netherlands. Until now a total of 67 cases have been notified. These were the first indigenous cases since 1978. None of the patients had been vaccinated before, and all but one belong to small Protestant groups that refuse vaccination for religious reasons. The age of the patients varies from several days to 61 years (mean age 19) and the male to female ratio is 1.6:1.0. The epidemic is caused by wild poliovirus type 3. Partial genomic sequencing showed closest resemblance to a virus isolated in India in 1991. The epidemiological characteristics of the present outbreak are similar to those of previous outbreaks in the seventies. Although vaccination coverage in the Netherlands is excellent (97% coverage for the first series of three doses with IPV vaccine), outbreaks can be expected because some socially closely interrelated small groups refuse vaccination (totalling about 200,000 persons) for religious reasons. Experience from this epidemic, from previous epidemics, and preliminary results of random stool and sewage sampling indicate very little circulating virus among the general population. Changes in (implementation of) the vaccination policy, including a mixed strategy with OPV and IPV, are being considered to reduce the risk of similar outbreaks in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Student > Master 5 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 44%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,507,503
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#43
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#662
of 65,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them