↓ Skip to main content

Annual acknowledgement of reviewers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Annual acknowledgement of reviewers
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12862-016-0618-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Foote

Abstract

The editors of BMC Evolutionary Biology would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in Volume 15 (2015).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,532,654
of 8,604,488 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1,768
of 2,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,608
of 288,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#50
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,604,488 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.