↓ Skip to main content

Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011320.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Armstrong, Priya Bhide, Vanessa Jordan, Allan Pacey, Jane Marjoribanks, Cindy Farquhar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,109,286
of 13,606,797 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,340
of 10,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,761
of 250,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,606,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.