↓ Skip to main content

A geospatial analysis of the impacts of maternity care fee payment policies on the uptake of skilled birth care in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A geospatial analysis of the impacts of maternity care fee payment policies on the uptake of skilled birth care in Ghana
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12884-016-0833-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiifi Amoako Johnson

Abstract

Many low and middle income countries have initiated maternity fee exemption and removal policies to promote use of skilled maternity care. After two and a half decades of these policies, uptake of skilled birth care remains low and inequalities continue to exist in many low and middle income countries. This study uses 2 decades of birth histories data to examine four maternity fee paying policies enacted in Ghana over the past 3 decades and their geospatial impacts on uptake of skilled delivery care. Bayesian Geoadditive Semiparametric regression techniques were applied on four conservative rounds of Demographic and Health Surveys in Ghana to examine the extent of geospatial dependence in skilled birth care use at the district level and their associative relationships with maternity fee paying policies focusing on the temporal trends when the policies were functional. The results show that at the country-level, the policies had a positive influence on use of skilled delivery care; however their impacts on reducing between-district inequalities were trivial. The findings suggest that targeted interventions at the district level are essential to strengthen maternal health programmes in Ghana.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 26%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Lecturer 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 25%
Social Sciences 18 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,445,779
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,476
of 4,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,188
of 297,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#56
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.