Title |
Pairing nuts and dried fruit for cardiometabolic health
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-016-0142-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Arianna Carughi, Mary Jo Feeney, Penny Kris-Etherton, Victor Fulgoni, Cyril W. C. Kendall, Mònica Bulló, Densie Webb |
Abstract |
Certain dietary patterns, in which fruits and nuts are featured prominently, reduce risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. However, estimated fruit consumption historically in the U.S. has been lower than recommendations. Dried fruit intake is even lower with only about 6.9 % of the adult population reporting any consumption. The 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee identified a gap between recommended fruit and vegetable intakes and the amount the population consumes. Even fewer Americans consume tree nuts, which are a nutrient-dense food, rich in bioactive compounds and healthy fatty acids. Consumption of fruits and nuts has been associated with reduced risk of cardiometabolic disease. An estimated 5.5 to 8.4 % of U.S. adults consume tree nuts and/or tree nut butter. This review examines the potential of pairing nuts and dried fruit to reduce cardiometabolic risk factors and focuses on emerging data on raisins and pistachios as representative of each food category. Evidence suggests that increasing consumption of both could help improve Americans' nutritional status and reduce the risk of chronic diseases. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 14 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
Peru | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 38 | 81% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 19% |
Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 17% |
Unknown | 37 | 33% |