↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic use for irreversible pulpitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
76 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic use for irreversible pulpitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004969.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anirudha Agnihotry, Wendy Thompson, Zbys Fedorowicz, Esther J van Zuuren, Julie Sprakel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#427,387
of 14,556,971 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,153
of 10,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,991
of 261,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,556,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.