You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expanding ART for Treatment and Prevention of HIV in South Africa: Estimated Cost and Cost-Effectiveness 2011-2050
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0030216 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reuben Granich, James G. Kahn, Rod Bennett, Charles B. Holmes, Navneet Garg, Celicia Serenata, Miriam Lewis Sabin, Carla Makhlouf-Obermeyer, Christina De Filippo Mack, Phoebe Williams, Louisa Jones, Caoimhe Smyth, Kerry A. Kutch, Lo Ying-Ru, Marco Vitoria, Yves Souteyrand, Siobhan Crowley, Eline L. Korenromp, Brian G. Williams |
| Abstract |
Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) significantly reduces HIV transmission. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of the impact of expanded ART in South Africa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| South Africa | 4 | 1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 268 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 25% |
| Researcher | 48 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 23 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 20% |
| Unknown | 62 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,220,791
of 23,504,791 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#63,877
of 201,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,076
of 253,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#696
of 3,448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.