You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Adherence to reporting guidelines increases the number of citations: the argument for including a methodologist in the editorial process and peer-review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0746-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marta Vilaró, Jordi Cortés, Albert Selva-O’Callaghan, Agustín Urrutia, Josep-Maria Ribera, Francesc Cardellach, Xavier Basagaña, Matthew Elmore, Miquel Vilardell, Douglas Altman, José-Antonio González, Erik Cobo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 12% |
Canada | 7 | 10% |
Spain | 4 | 6% |
France | 3 | 4% |
Ireland | 3 | 4% |
Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 48% |
Scientists | 28 | 42% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Librarian | 4 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Mathematics | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 22% |
Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,118,768
of 25,046,944 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#115
of 2,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,631
of 356,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,944 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.