↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2004
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-3-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Obinna Onwujekwe, Kara Hanson, Julia Fox-Rushby

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 1%
Uganda 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 26%
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 30 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 18%
Social Sciences 12 13%
Unspecified 11 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 8%
Other 24 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,638,501
of 12,524,399 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,404
of 3,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,092
of 268,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,524,399 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.