↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive Deficits Are Associated with Frontal and Temporal Lobe White Matter Lesions in Middle-Aged Adults Living in the Community

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive Deficits Are Associated with Frontal and Temporal Lobe White Matter Lesions in Middle-Aged Adults Living in the Community
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013567
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Bunce, Kaarin J. Anstey, Nicolas Cherbuin, Richard Burns, Helen Christensen, Wei Wen, Perminder S. Sachdev

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 27%
Neuroscience 13 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2010.
All research outputs
#5,504,122
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#67,212
of 194,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,007
of 99,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#415
of 927 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 927 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.