↓ Skip to main content

Tomographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in malocclusion subjects: condylar morphology and position

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tomographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in malocclusion subjects: condylar morphology and position
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, March 2016
DOI 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2016.vol30.0017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Fonseca Merigue, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro, Ricardo de Lima Navarro, Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate condyle concentricity and morphology, and their association with Class I and II malocclusions (Angle). The sample consisted of 49 individuals of both genders, between 11 and 35 years old, divided into two groups, G1: 26 patients with Class I malocclusion, and G2: 23 patients with Class II malocclusion, selected for orthodontic treatment. Evaluation of the condyle morphology and position was performed by the same previously calibrated examiner using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the subjects. The CBCT scans were analyzed by means of a 3D program (Dolphin 11.5, Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA, USA), with a 25% level of sensitivity. The images obtained from the coronal slices were employed for the condyle morphology analysis, which classified the condyle form as rounded, as flat or convex, and as triangular or angled. The sagittal slices were used to classify further the condyles as concentric and displaced anteriorly or posteriorly. A clinical examination was also performed, including TMJ and muscle palpation. The kappa test was used to evaluate investigator calibration; the Chi-square and paired t-tests were used for analysis. The convex and anteriorly positioned condyles were found most frequently, regardless of the type of malocclusion. No association was observed between the groups regarding condylar characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Postgraduate 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Researcher 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 40 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 50%
Unspecified 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 46 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#272
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,490
of 313,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.