You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gray Matter Alterations in Early and Late Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Evaluated with Synthetic Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-44615-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Andica, Akifumi Hagiwara, Koji Kamagata, Kazumasa Yokoyama, Keigo Shimoji, Asami Saito, Yuki Takenaka, Misaki Nakazawa, Masaaki Hori, Julien Cohen-Adad, Mariko Yoshida Takemura, Nobutaka Hattori, Shigeki Aoki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2020.
All research outputs
#13,413,823
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#59,556
of 125,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,824
of 350,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,592
of 3,108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.