↓ Skip to main content

How Should Clinicians and Trainees Respond to Each Other and to Patients Whose Views or Behaviors Are Offensive?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Should Clinicians and Trainees Respond to Each Other and to Patients Whose Views or Behaviors Are Offensive?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, June 2019
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2019.480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cory D Mitchell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 13%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Psychology 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,767,712
of 26,170,895 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#533
of 2,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,898
of 366,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.