You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trying to identify who may benefit most from future vitamin D intervention trials: a post hoc analysis from the VITDAL-ICU study excluding the early deaths
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2472-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gennaro Martucci, Dayre McNally, Dhruv Parekh, Paul Zajic, Fabio Tuzzolino, Antonio Arcadipane, Kenneth B. Christopher, Harald Dobnig, Karin Amrein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| Mexico | 5 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| South Africa | 2 | 6% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 53% |
| Scientists | 8 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,663,996
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,466
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,126
of 366,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#42
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.