The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 157 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mayo Clinic's 5-Step Policy for Responding to Bias Incidents.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2019.521 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rahma M Warsame, Sharonne N Hayes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 51 | 32% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Lebanon | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 39 | 25% |
| Scientists | 34 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 28% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
#291,705
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#83
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,724
of 367,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.