↓ Skip to main content

Effect of amphibian chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) on apparent survival of frogs and toads in the western USA

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of amphibian chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) on apparent survival of frogs and toads in the western USA
Published in
Biological Conservation, August 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.017
Authors

Robin E. Russell, Brian J. Halstead, Brittany A. Mosher, Erin Muths, Michael J. Adams, Evan H.C. Grant, Robert N. Fisher, Patrick M. Kleeman, Adam R. Backlin, Christopher A. Pearl, R. Ken Honeycutt, Blake R. Hossack

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 46%
Environmental Science 11 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,931,935
of 15,226,794 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,815
of 4,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,317
of 265,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#79
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,226,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.