You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Beyond interviews and focus groups: a framework for integrating innovative qualitative methods into randomised controlled trials of complex public health interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-019-3439-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katy Davis, Nicole Minckas, Virginia Bond, Cari Jo Clark, Tim Colbourn, Sarah J. Drabble, Therese Hesketh, Zelee Hill, Joanna Morrison, Oliver Mweemba, David Osrin, Audrey Prost, Janet Seeley, Maryam Shahmanesh, Esther J. Spindler, Erin Stern, Katrina M. Turner, Jenevieve Mannell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 23% |
| United States | 19 | 14% |
| Australia | 11 | 8% |
| Ireland | 10 | 8% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Nepal | 2 | 2% |
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 44 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 50% |
| Scientists | 58 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 242 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 13% |
| Researcher | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 72 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 12% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 42 | 17% |
| Unknown | 91 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#519,446
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#30
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,962
of 369,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.