You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The PCNA interaction motifs revisited: thinking outside the PIP-box
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00018-019-03150-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Prestel, Nanna Wichmann, Joao M. Martins, Riccardo Marabini, Noah Kassem, Sebastian S. Broendum, Marit Otterlei, Olaf Nielsen, Martin Willemoës, Michael Ploug, Wouter Boomsma, Birthe B. Kragelund |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Argentina | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Denmark | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 56 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 49 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,085,568
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,487
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,618
of 351,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#39
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.