↓ Skip to main content

Rock Art at the Pleistocene/Holocene Boundary in Eastern South America

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rock Art at the Pleistocene/Holocene Boundary in Eastern South America
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter A. Neves, Astolfo G. M. Araujo, Danilo V. Bernardo, Renato Kipnis, James K. Feathers

Abstract

Most investigations regarding the first americans have primarily focused on four themes: when the New World was settled by humans; where they came from; how many migrations or colonization pulses from elsewhere were involved in the process; and what kinds of subsistence patterns and material culture they developed during the first millennia of colonization. Little is known, however, about the symbolic world of the first humans who settled the New World, because artistic manifestations either as rock-art, ornaments, and portable art objects dated to the Pleistocene/Holocene transition are exceedingly rare in the Americas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
Portugal 2 3%
Colombia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 64 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 13%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 22 28%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 27 35%
Social Sciences 17 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 4 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#554,892
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,912
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,633
of 156,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#105
of 3,531 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,531 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.