You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glove port, how do we do it? A low-cost alternative to the single-port approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-016-4820-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lara Fernández Cepedal, Mikel Prieto Calvo, Héctor Marín Ortega, Aingeru Sarriugarte Lasarte, Christian Pérez González, José Félix Fernández Val, José María García González, Alberto Colina Alonso |
| Abstract |
The need for cosmetic results in our society and the necessity of an early recovery have promoted the development of minimally invasive techniques, including single-port approach. Some studies have tried to demonstrate the advantages of this access compared with conventional laparoscopic approach. This type of approach requires a high-cost multi-port device, so that some surgeons have tried to create a low-cost homemade device. With this video we intend to show how to build a glove port, a low-cost alternative for the approach by a single port. A glove port is a cost effective approach that could be use instead of multi-port device. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 40% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 30% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 10% |
| Engineering | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2016.
All research outputs
#13,462,624
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,864
of 6,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,848
of 299,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#42
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.