You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Combined Aspirin and Clopidogrel Therapy on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0031642 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu-Hao Zhou, Xin Wei, Jian Lu, Xiao-Fei Ye, Mei-Jing Wu, Jin-Fang Xu, Ying-Yi Qin, Jia He |
| Abstract |
Aspirin and clopidogrel monotherapies are effective treatments for preventing vascular disease. However, new evidence has emerged regarding the use of combined aspirin and clopidogrel therapy to prevent cardiovascular events. We therefore performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits and harms of combined aspirin and clopidogrel therapy on major cardiovascular outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 43% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,544,244
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#61,959
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,309
of 250,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#769
of 3,456 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,456 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.