↓ Skip to main content

Clinical evaluation of dengue and identification of risk factors for severe disease: protocol for a multicentre study in 8 countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical evaluation of dengue and identification of risk factors for severe disease: protocol for a multicentre study in 8 countries
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-1440-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Jaenisch, Dong Thi Hoai Tam, Nguyen Tan Thanh Kieu, Tran Van Ngoc, Nguyen Tran Nam, Nguyen Van Kinh, Sophie Yacoub, Ngoun Chanpheaktra, Varun Kumar, Lucy Lum Chai See, Jameela Sathar, Ernesto Pleités Sandoval, Gabriela Maria Marón Alfaro, Ida Safitri Laksono, Yodi Mahendradhata, Malabika Sarker, Firoz Ahmed, Andrea Caprara, Bruno Souza Benevides, Ernesto T. A. Marques, Tereza Magalhaes, Patricia Brasil, Marco Netto, Adriana Tami, Sarah E. Bethencourt, Maria Guzman, Cameron Simmons, Nguyen Thanh Ha Quyen, Laura Merson, Nguyen Thi Phuong Dung, Dorothea Beck, Marius Wirths, Marcel Wolbers, Phung Khanh Lam, Kerstin Rosenberger, Bridget Wills

Abstract

The burden of dengue continues to increase globally, with an estimated 100 million clinically apparent infections occurring each year. Although most dengue infections are asymptomatic, patients can present with a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms ranging from mild febrile illness through to severe manifestations of bleeding, organ impairment, and hypovolaemic shock due to a systemic vascular leak syndrome. Clinical diagnosis of dengue and identification of which patients are likely to develop severe disease remain challenging. This study aims to improve diagnosis and clinical management through approaches designed a) to differentiate between dengue and other common febrile illness within 72 h of fever onset, and b) among patients with dengue to identify markers that are predictive of the likelihood of evolving to a more severe disease course. This is a prospective multi-centre observational study aiming to enrol 7-8000 participants aged ≥ 5 years presenting with a febrile illness consistent with dengue to outpatient health facilities in 8 countries across Asia and Latin America. Patients presenting within 72 h of fever onset who do not exhibit signs of severe disease are eligible for the study. A broad range of clinical and laboratory parameters are assessed daily for up to 6 days during the acute illness, and also at a follow up visit 1 week later. Data from this large cohort of patients, enrolled early with undifferentiated fever, will be used to develop a practical diagnostic algorithm and a robust clinical case definition for dengue. Additionally, among patients with confirmed dengue we aim to identify simple clinical and laboratory parameters associated with progression to a more severe disease course. We will also investigate early virological and serological correlates of severe disease, and examine genetic associations in this large heterogeneous cohort. In addition the results will be used to assess the new World Health Organization classification scheme for dengue in practice, and to update the guidelines for "Integrated Management of Childhood Illness" used in dengue-endemic countries. NCT01550016 . Registration Date: March 7, 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 185 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 53 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,476,657
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,543
of 7,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,509
of 299,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#43
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.