↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
392 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss
Published in
Human Genetics, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00439-016-1648-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina M. Sloan-Heggen, Amanda O. Bierer, A. Eliot Shearer, Diana L. Kolbe, Carla J. Nishimura, Kathy L. Frees, Sean S. Ephraim, Seiji B. Shibata, Kevin T. Booth, Colleen A. Campbell, Paul T. Ranum, Amy E. Weaver, E. Ann Black-Ziegelbein, Donghong Wang, Hela Azaiez, Richard J. H. Smith

Abstract

Hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit in humans, affecting 1 in 500 newborns. Due to its genetic heterogeneity, comprehensive diagnostic testing has not previously been completed in a large multiethnic cohort. To determine the aggregate contribution inheritance makes to non-syndromic hearing loss, we performed comprehensive clinical genetic testing with targeted genomic enrichment and massively parallel sequencing on 1119 sequentially accrued patients. No patient was excluded based on phenotype, inheritance or previous testing. Testing resulted in identification of the underlying genetic cause for hearing loss in 440 patients (39 %). Pathogenic variants were found in 49 genes and included missense variants (49 %), large copy number changes (18 %), small insertions and deletions (18 %), nonsense variants (8 %), splice-site alterations (6 %), and promoter variants (<1 %). The diagnostic rate varied considerably based on phenotype and was highest for patients with a positive family history of hearing loss or when the loss was congenital and symmetric. The spectrum of implicated genes showed wide ethnic variability. These findings support the more efficient utilization of medical resources through the development of evidence-based algorithms for the diagnosis of hearing loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 248 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Other 21 8%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 73 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 78 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,416,599
of 24,825,035 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#104
of 3,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,411
of 305,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,825,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.