↓ Skip to main content

Improved parameter-estimation with combined PET-MRI kinetic modelling

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Physics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved parameter-estimation with combined PET-MRI kinetic modelling
Published in
EJNMMI Physics, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/2197-7364-2-s1-a25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kjell Erlandsson, Maria Liljeroth, David Atkinson, Simon Arridge, Sebastien Ourselin, Brian Hutton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 67%
Neuroscience 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,591,984
of 7,391,940 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Physics
#25
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,094
of 275,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Physics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,391,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them