↓ Skip to main content

Botulinum toxin for shoulder pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Botulinum toxin for shoulder pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008271.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasvinder A Singh, Patrick M Fitzgerald

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 126 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 26 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,249,529
of 14,083,287 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,244
of 10,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,340
of 259,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,083,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.