↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on dirt field and artificial turf field by amateur football players

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on dirt field and artificial turf field by amateur football players
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1758-2555-3-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramin Kordi, Farajollah Hemmati, Hamid Heidarian, Vahid Ziaee

Abstract

Data on the incidence, nature, severity and cause of match football injuries sustained on dirt field are scarce. The objectives of this study was to compare the incidence, nature, severity and cause of match injuries sustained on dirt field and artificial turf field by amateur male football players.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 110 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 28%
Student > Master 14 13%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 30 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#15,184,741
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#365
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,994
of 194,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them