↓ Skip to main content

Writing the literature review for empirical papers

Overview of attention for article published in Production, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

4 tweeters


49 Dimensions

Readers on

588 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Writing the literature review for empirical papers
Published in
Production, March 2018
DOI 10.1590/0103-6513.20170086

Davi Nakano, Jorge Muniz Jr.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 588 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 588 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 110 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 11%
Student > Bachelor 55 9%
Lecturer 31 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 4%
Other 107 18%
Unknown 194 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 74 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 65 11%
Engineering 38 6%
Computer Science 34 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 5%
Other 138 23%
Unknown 211 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
of 21,397,370 outputs
Outputs from Production
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 289,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Production
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,397,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one scored the same or higher as 45 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them