↓ Skip to main content

Proteomics of Bordetella pertussis whole-cell and acellular vaccines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proteomics of Bordetella pertussis whole-cell and acellular vaccines
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13104-019-4373-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Möller, Max Edmund Kraner, Andreas Burkovski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 75%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#10,294,901
of 13,494,857 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,920
of 3,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,862
of 249,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,494,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,058 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them