You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0824-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. Katrien J. Groenhof, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Rolf H. H. Groenwold, Diederick E. Grobbee, Frank L. J. Visseren, Michiel L. Bots |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,059,377
of 24,554,073 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#658
of 2,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,834
of 358,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,554,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.