↓ Skip to main content

Refinement of eDNA as an early monitoring tool at the landscape‐level: study design considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Refinement of eDNA as an early monitoring tool at the landscape‐level: study design considerations
Published in
Ecological Applications, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/eap.1951
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. L. Mize, R. A. Erickson, C. M. Merkes, N. Berndt, K. Bockrath, J. Credico, N. Grueneis, J. Merry, K. Mosel, M. Tuttle‐Lau, K. Von Ruden, Z. Woiak, J. J. Amberg, K. Baerwaldt, S. Finney, E. Monroe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 30%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 47%
Environmental Science 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Engineering 2 4%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,353,729
of 15,440,662 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#635
of 2,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,709
of 267,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#23
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,440,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.