↓ Skip to main content

Gut microbiome analysis by post: Evaluation of the optimal method to collect stool samples from infants within a national cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gut microbiome analysis by post: Evaluation of the optimal method to collect stool samples from infants within a national cohort study
Published in
PLoS ONE, June 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0216557
Pubmed ID
Authors

Williams, Georgina M., Leary, Sam D., Ajami, Nadim J., Chipper Keating, Saranna, Petrosin, Joseph F., Hamilton-Shield, Julian P., Gillespie, Kathleen M.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Unspecified 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Other 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Unspecified 2 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Mathematics 1 7%
Other 5 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,462,921
of 13,594,282 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#23,202
of 144,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,996
of 252,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#58
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,594,282 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.