↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
292 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007781.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Sauerland, Maren Walgenbach, Brigitte Habermalz, Christoph M Seiler, Marc Miserez

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2016.
All research outputs
#11,143,388
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,898
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,627
of 304,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#160
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.