You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Sensitivity of grain yields to historical climate variability in India
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), June 2019
Kyle Frankel Davis, Ashwini Chhatre, Narasimha D Rao, Deepti Singh, Ruth DeFries
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||11||73%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||7%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||23||23%|
|Student > Master||16||16%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||5||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||13||13%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||12||12%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||6||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
of 5,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 355,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.