You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of Consumption of a High-Protein vs. High-Carbohydrate Meal on the Physiological Cortisol and Psychological Mood Response in Men and Women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0016826 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sofie G. Lemmens, Jurriaan M. Born, Eveline A. Martens, Mieke J. Martens, Margriet S. Westerterp-Plantenga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 20% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 41 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 44 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,481,534
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,303
of 194,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,330
of 182,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#143
of 1,259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.