↓ Skip to main content

Effects of lek count protocols on greater sage-grouse population trend estimates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of lek count protocols on greater sage-grouse population trend estimates
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2016
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.1050
Authors

Adrian P. Monroe, David R. Edmunds, Cameron L. Aldridge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 56%
Environmental Science 12 29%
Computer Science 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Unknown 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,632,892
of 13,475,477 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#180
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,794
of 309,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,475,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.