↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
346 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
492 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
934 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist
Published in
British Medical Journal, March 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i1174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Smisha Agarwal, Amnesty E LeFevre, Jaime Lee, Kelly L'Engle, Garrett Mehl, Chaitali Sinha, Alain Labrique

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 346 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 934 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Unknown 919 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 161 17%
Student > Master 159 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 58 6%
Other 53 6%
Other 193 21%
Unknown 179 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 237 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 112 12%
Computer Science 78 8%
Psychology 58 6%
Social Sciences 57 6%
Other 160 17%
Unknown 232 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 257. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#147,282
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#2,127
of 65,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,620
of 331,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#34
of 964 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 964 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.