↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
359 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
416 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
840 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Summary Blogs Policy documents Twitter Facebook Google+ Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist
Published in
British Medical Journal, March 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i1174
Pubmed ID
26988021
Authors

Smisha Agarwal, Amnesty E LeFevre, Jaime Lee, Kelly L’Engle, Garrett Mehl, Chaitali Sinha, Alain Labrique

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 359 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 840 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Unknown 825 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 158 19%
Student > Master 148 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 121 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 56 7%
Other 50 6%
Other 177 21%
Unknown 130 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 220 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 102 12%
Computer Science 76 9%
Social Sciences 58 7%
Psychology 57 7%
Other 142 17%
Unknown 185 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 270. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#113,860
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,864
of 60,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,366
of 327,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#31
of 965 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 965 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.