You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.i1174 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Smisha Agarwal, Amnesty E LeFevre, Jaime Lee, Kelly L'Engle, Garrett Mehl, Chaitali Sinha, Alain Labrique |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 347 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 81 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 44 | 13% |
| Spain | 32 | 9% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| Australia | 8 | 2% |
| Ireland | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 1% |
| India | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 45 | 13% |
| Unknown | 107 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 219 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 60 | 17% |
| Scientists | 58 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 929 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 914 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 161 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 157 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 131 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 58 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 6% |
| Other | 196 | 21% |
| Unknown | 173 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 237 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 109 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 78 | 8% |
| Psychology | 58 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 57 | 6% |
| Other | 164 | 18% |
| Unknown | 226 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 260. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#143,798
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#2,105
of 65,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,583
of 331,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#33
of 963 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 963 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.