↓ Skip to main content

Critical Thinking for Social Justice in Global Geographical Learning in Schools

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geography, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Critical Thinking for Social Justice in Global Geographical Learning in Schools
Published in
Journal of Geography, March 2019
DOI 10.1080/00221341.2019.1575454
Authors

Gapcheol Kim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#9,704,625
of 15,248,235 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geography
#79
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,005
of 266,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geography
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,248,235 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.