You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Probing Evolutionary Patterns in Neotropical Birds through DNA Barcodes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004379 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin C. R. Kerr, Darío A. Lijtmaer, Ana S. Barreira, Paul D. N. Hebert, Pablo L. Tubaro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 328 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 19% |
| Researcher | 68 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 74 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 242 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,575,425
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#133,826
of 197,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,193
of 171,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#469
of 537 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 537 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.