You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Guest Editor's introduction
|
---|---|
Published in |
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, January 2007
|
DOI | 10.2130/jjesp.46.37 |
Authors |
Yumi Endo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,860,194
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
#119
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,950
of 168,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.