You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictive Markers of Honey Bee Colony Collapse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0032151 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin Dainat, Jay D. Evans, Yan Ping Chen, Laurent Gauthier, Peter Neumann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 19% |
| France | 6 | 10% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 403 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 17% |
| Researcher | 70 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 79 | 19% |
| Unknown | 59 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 212 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 20 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 11% |
| Unknown | 75 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#693,726
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,269
of 222,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,106
of 169,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#114
of 3,532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.