↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of facial muscle anatomy in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 84,520)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
306 news outlets
blogs
25 blogs
twitter
1659 tweeters
facebook
28 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of facial muscle anatomy in dogs
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1820653116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliane Kaminski, Bridget M. Waller, Rui Diogo, Adam Hartstone-Rose, Anne M. Burrows

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,659 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Master 14 11%
Other 11 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 29%
Psychology 17 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 27 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3823. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#345
of 15,184,341 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#13
of 84,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9
of 263,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1
of 890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,184,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.