↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of facial muscle anatomy in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 82,455)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
306 news outlets
blogs
24 blogs
twitter
1680 tweeters
facebook
15 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of facial muscle anatomy in dogs
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1820653116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliane Kaminski, Bridget M. Waller, Rui Diogo, Adam Hartstone-Rose, Anne M. Burrows

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,680 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 9 8%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 31%
Psychology 14 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 20 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3826. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#172
of 14,389,463 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7
of 82,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9
of 259,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1
of 887 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,389,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 887 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.