↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of facial muscle anatomy in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 86,272)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
309 news outlets
blogs
25 blogs
twitter
1711 tweeters
facebook
28 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of facial muscle anatomy in dogs
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1820653116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliane Kaminski, Bridget M. Waller, Rui Diogo, Adam Hartstone-Rose, Anne M. Burrows

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,711 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 12 8%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 28%
Psychology 21 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 33 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3888. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#450
of 15,949,522 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#18
of 86,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 268,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1
of 890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,949,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.