↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Candidate Bacteria: Associations with BV and Behavioural Practices in Sexually-Experienced and Inexperienced Women

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
4 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Candidate Bacteria: Associations with BV and Behavioural Practices in Sexually-Experienced and Inexperienced Women
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030633
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Fethers, Jimmy Twin, Christopher K. Fairley, Freya J. I. Fowkes, Suzanne M. Garland, Glenda Fehler, Anna M. Morton, Jane S. Hocking, Sepehr N. Tabrizi, Catriona S. Bradshaw

Abstract

In recent years several new fastidious bacteria have been identified that display a high specificity for BV; however no previous studies have comprehensively assessed the behavioural risk associations of these bacterial vaginosis-candidate organisms (BV-COs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
South Africa 2 2%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,004,626
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#71,528
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,769
of 156,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#996
of 3,607 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,607 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.