↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009912.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlene J Treanor, Olinda Santin, Gillian Prue, Helen Coleman, Chris R Cardwell, Peter O'Halloran, Michael Donnelly

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 29%
Unspecified 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 25%
Unspecified 11 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2019.
All research outputs
#777,119
of 13,629,017 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,457
of 10,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,935
of 251,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,629,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.