↓ Skip to main content

An alternative approach to establishing unbiased colorectal cancer risk estimation in Lynch syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An alternative approach to establishing unbiased colorectal cancer risk estimation in Lynch syndrome
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, June 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41436-019-0577-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manon Suerink, Mar Rodríguez-Girondo, Heleen M. van der Klift, Chrystelle Colas, Laurence Brugieres, Noémie Lavoine, Marjolijn Jongmans, Gabriel Capellá Munar, D. Gareth Evans, Michael P. Farrell, Maurizio Genuardi, Yael Goldberg, Encarna Gomez-Garcia, Karl Heinimann, Jessica I. Hoell, Stefan Aretz, Kory W. Jasperson, Inbal Kedar, Mitul B. Modi, Sergey Nikolaev, Theo A. M. van Os, Tim Ripperger, Daniel Rueda, Leigha Senter, Wenche Sjursen, Lone Sunde, Christina Therkildsen, Maria G. Tibiletti, Alison H. Trainer, Yvonne J. Vos, Anja Wagner, Ingrid Winship, Katharina Wimmer, Stefanie Y. Zimmermann, Hans F. Vasen, Christi J. van Asperen, Jeanine J. Houwing-Duistermaat, Sanne W. ten Broeke, Maartje Nielsen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,523,509
of 17,027,788 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#645
of 2,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,883
of 271,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#32
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,027,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.