↓ Skip to main content

Mixed methods evaluation of a hospital group model using an embedded research approach: study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mixed methods evaluation of a hospital group model using an embedded research approach: study protocol
Published in
BMJ Open, June 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027086
Authors

Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Estela Capelas Barbosa, Angus I G Ramsay, Simon Turner, Stephen Morris, Ronald Agble, Amy Caldwell-Nichols, Naomi J Fulop

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,563,456
of 15,283,645 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#4,885
of 13,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,942
of 264,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#312
of 978 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,283,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 978 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.