↓ Skip to main content

Ten-million years of activity within the Eastern California Shear Zone from U–Pb dating of fault-zone opal

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Ten-million years of activity within the Eastern California Shear Zone from U–Pb dating of fault-zone opal
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, September 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.05.047
Authors

Perach Nuriel, David M. Miller, Kevin M. Schmidt, Matthew A. Coble, Kate Maher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#11,754,981
of 13,243,449 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#2,872
of 3,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,011
of 185,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#72
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,243,449 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.