↓ Skip to main content

The architecture of functional modules in the Hsp90 co‐chaperone Sti1/Hop

Overview of attention for article published in EMBO Journal, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The architecture of functional modules in the Hsp90 co‐chaperone Sti1/Hop
Published in
EMBO Journal, January 2012
DOI 10.1038/emboj.2011.472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas B Schmid, Stephan Lagleder, Melissa Ann Gräwert, Alina Röhl, Franz Hagn, Sebastian K Wandinger, Marc B Cox, Oliver Demmer, Klaus Richter, Michael Groll, Horst Kessler, Johannes Buchner

Abstract

Sti1/Hop is a modular protein required for the transfer of client proteins from the Hsp70 to the Hsp90 chaperone system in eukaryotes. It binds Hsp70 and Hsp90 simultaneously via TPR (tetratricopeptide repeat) domains. Sti1/Hop contains three TPR domains (TPR1, TPR2A and TPR2B) and two domains of unknown structure (DP1 and DP2). We show that TPR2A is the high affinity Hsp90-binding site and TPR1 and TPR2B bind Hsp70 with moderate affinity. The DP domains exhibit highly homologous α-helical folds as determined by NMR. These, and especially DP2, are important for client activation in vivo. The core module of Sti1 for Hsp90 inhibition is the TPR2A-TPR2B segment. In the crystal structure, the two TPR domains are connected via a rigid linker orienting their peptide-binding sites in opposite directions and allowing the simultaneous binding of TPR2A to the Hsp90 C-terminal domain and of TPR2B to Hsp70. Both domains also interact with the Hsp90 middle domain. The accessory TPR1-DP1 module may serve as an Hsp70-client delivery system for the TPR2A-TPR2B-DP2 segment, which is required for client activation in vivo.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 29%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 34%
Chemistry 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 24 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,363,939
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from EMBO Journal
#6,101
of 12,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,786
of 246,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EMBO Journal
#19
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.