↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Presentation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Survey of 800 Cases

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Presentation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Survey of 800 Cases
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Miniati, Caterina Cenci, Simonetta Monti, Daniela Poli

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and potentially fatal disease that is still underdiagnosed. The objective of our study was to reappraise the clinical presentation of PE with emphasis on the identification of the symptoms and signs that prompt the patients to seek medical attention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,773
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,681
of 155,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,631
of 3,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.